- No flash. It be agin the rules at Rock Creek. For the most part, the horses at our very public facility would probably take camera flash in stride, but it takes just one freakout to make the others edgy (to say nothing of what it would do to the nerves of anyone having to deal with said large flailing animal). The barn and ring are dim, and these days it's dark outside when I arrive for class, so it's hard to get a natural-light shot.
- No angles. Assuming arguendum that there's enough light in the barn and the horse is standing still, you can shoot a no-flash pic and have it come out in focus, but it's beyond me to get a good angle on a horse on cross-ties in a narrow aisle.
- No hands. I've snuck glances in the ring's mirror and can confirm that Lear looks entirely adorable when he goes on the bit or floats over cavaletti. He's even kind of cute when he's at peak goony spasticness. But given his history of squirreling out over random things, when I'm working with him I try to keep both hands on the reins and all my attention on him.
- No skill. You get right down to it, a not-very-good photographer is a not-very-good photographer. I'm working on it, I promise.
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Snippety-snap
A friend recently asked me why I don't post more pictures of the horses I talk so much about. There are several simple reasons.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
You could, say, have a friend come take pictures.
Wait. Tried that. Only solves the "No Hands" problem.
I could also, say, go in on the weekend and borry myself a horse to photograph, which would also solve the light and angles problems (or at least mitigate them), leaving only the crappy-photog problem. It's a question of motivation: Do I spend valuable napping time trying to keep Lear from indulging his nipping time? Not to date.
Post a Comment